A POSTSCRIPT, WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN A PREFACE.
Our journey is now finished, gentle reader; and if your patience has accompanied me through these sheets, the contract is, on your part, strictly fulfilled.Yet, like the driver who has received his full hire, I still linger near you, and make, with becoming diffidence, a trifling additional claim upon your bounty and good nature.You are as free, however, to shut the volume of the one petitioner, as to close your door in the face of the other.
This should have been a prefatory chapter, but for two reasons:---First, that most novel readers, as my own conscience reminds me, are apt to be guilty of the sin of omission respecting that same matter of prefaces;---Secondly, that it is a general custom with that class of students, to begin with the last chapter of a work; so that, after all, these remarks, being introduced last in order, have still the best chance to be read in their proper place.
There is no European nation which, within the course of half a century, or little more, has undergone so complete a change as this kingdom of Scotland.The effects of the insurrection of 1745---the destruction of the patriarchal power of the Highland chiefs---the abolition of the heritable jurisdictions of the Lowland nobility and barons---the total eradication of the Jacobite party, which, averse to intermingle with the English, or adopt their customs, long continued to pride themselves upon maintaining ancient Scottish manners and customs---commenced this innovation.The gradual influx of wealth, and extension of commerce, have since united to render the present people of Scotland a class of beings as different from their grandfathers as the existing English are from those of Queen Elizabeth's time.
The political and economical effects of these changes have been traced by Lord Selkirk with great precision and accuracy.But the change, though steadily and rapidly progressive, has, nevertheless, been gradual; and like those who drift down the stream of a deep and smooth river, we are not aware of the progress we have made, until we fix our eye on the now distant point from which we have been drifted.---Such of the present generation as can recollect the last twenty or twenty-five years of the eighteenth century, will be fully sensible of the truth of this statement especially if their acquaintance and connexions lay among those who, in my younger time, were facetiously called ``folks of the old leaven,'' who still cherished a lingering, though hopeless, attachment to the house of Stuart.This race has now almost entirely vanished from the land, and with it, doubtless, much absurd political prejudice---but also many living examples of singular and disinterested attachment to the principles of loyalty which they received from their fathers, and of old Scottish faith, hospitality, worth, and honour.
It was my accidental lot, though not born a Highlander (which may be an apology for much bad Gaelic), to reside during my childhood and youth among persons of the above description;---and now, for the purpose of preserving some idea of the ancient manners of which I have witnessed the almost total extinction, I have embodied in imaginary scenes, and ascribed to fictitious characters, a part of the incidents which Ithen received from those who were actors in them.Indeed, the most romantic parts of this narrative are precisely those which have a foundation in fact.The exchange of mutual protection between a Highland gentleman and an officer of rank in the king's service, together with the spirited manner in which the latter asserted his right to return the favour he had received.
is literally true.The accident by a musket-shot, and the heroic reply imputed to Flora, relate to a lady of rank not long deceased.
And scarce a gentleman who was ``in hiding'' after the battle of Culloden but could tell a tale of strange concealments, and of wild and hair's-breadth 'scapes, as extraordinary as any which Ihave ascribed to my heroes.Of this, the escape of Charles Edward himself, as the most prominent, is the most striking example.The accounts of the battle of Preston and skirmish at Clifton are taken from the narrative of intelligent eye-witnesses, and corrected from the History of the Rebellion by the late venerable author of Douglas.The Lowland Scottish gentlemen, and the subordinate characters, are not given as individual portraits, but are drawn from the general habits of the period (of which I have witnessed some remnants in my younger days), and partly gathered from tradition.
It has been my object to describe these persons, not by a caricatured and exaggerated use of the national dialect, but by their habits, manners, and feelings; so as in some distant degree to emulate the admirable Irish portraits drawn by Miss Edgeworth, so different from the ``Teagues'' and ``dear joys''
who so long, with the most perfect family resemblance to each other, occupied the drama and the novel.
I feel no confidence, however, in the manner in which I have executed my purpose.Indeed, so little was I satisfied with my production, that I laid it aside in an unfinished state, and only found it again by mere accident among other waste papers in an old cabinet, the drawers of which I was rummaging in order to accommodate a friend with some fishing-tackle, after it had been mislaid for several years.Two works upon similar subjects, by female authors, whose genius is highly creditable to their country, have appeared in the interval; I mean Mrs.Hamilton's Glenburnie, and the late account of Highland Superstitions.
But the first is confined to the rural habits of Scotland, of which it has given a picture with striking and impressive fidelity; and the traditional records of the respectable and ingenious Mrs.
Grant of Laggan, are of a nature distinct from the fictitious narrative which I have here attempted.
