That England could rise again, that she could rise with a new life, strengthened by her momentary overthrow, was before all things owing to the lucky destiny which, if she was to be conquered, gave her William the Great as her Conqueror.It is as it is in all human affairs.William himself could not have done all that he did, wittingly and unwittingly, unless circumstances had been favourable to him; but favourable circumstances would have been useless, unless there had been a man like William to take advantage of them.What he did, wittingly or unwittingly, he did by virtue of his special position, the position of a foreign conqueror veiling his conquest under a legal claim.The hour and the man were alike needed.The man in his own hour wrought a work, partly conscious, partly unconscious.The more clearly any man understands his conscious work, the more sure is that conscious work to lead to further results of which he dreams not.So it was with the Conqueror of England.His purpose was to win and to keep the kingdom of England, and to hand it on to those who should come after him more firmly united than it had ever been before.In this work his spirit of formal legality, his shrinking from needless change, stood him in good stead.He saw that as the kingdom of England could best be won by putting forth a legal claim to it, so it could best be kept by putting on the character of a legal ruler, and reigning as the successor of the old kings seeking the unity of the kingdom; he saw, from the example both of England and of other lands, the dangers which threatened that unity; he saw what measures were needed to preserve it in his own day, measures which have preserved it ever since.Here is a work, a conscious work, which entitles the foreign Conqueror to a place among English statesmen, and to a place in their highest rank.Further than this we cannot conceive William himself to have looked.All that was to come of his work in future ages was of necessity hidden from his eyes, no less than from the eyes of smaller men.He had assuredly no formal purpose to make England Norman; but still less had he any thought that the final outcome of his work would make England on one side more truly English than if he had never crossed the sea.In his ecclesiastical work he saw the future still less clearly.He designed to reform what he deemed abuses, to bring the English Church into closer conformity with the other Churches of the West; he assuredly never dreamed that the issue of his reform would be the strife between Henry and Thomas and the humiliation of John.His error was that of forgetting that he himself could wield powers, that he could hold forces in check, which would be too strong for those who should come after him.At his purposes with regard to the relations of England and Normandy it would be vain to guess.The mere leaving of kingdom and duchy to different sons would not necessarily imply that he designed a complete or lasting separation.But assuredly William did not foresee that England, dragged into wars with France as the ally of Normandy, would remain the lasting rival of France after Normandy had been swallowed up in the French kingdom.If rivalry between England and France had not come in this way, it would doubtless have come in some other way; but this is the way in which it did come about.As a result of the union of Normandy and England under one ruler, it was part of William's work, but a work of which William had no thought.So it was with the increased connexion of every kind between England and the continent of Europe which followed on William's coming.With one part of Europe indeed the connexion of England was lessened.For three centuries before William's coming, dealings in war and peace with the Scandinavian kingdoms had made up a large part of English history.Since the baffled enterprise of the holy Cnut, our dealings with that part of Europe have been of only secondary account.
But in our view of William as an English statesman, the main feature of all is that spirit of formal legality of which we have so often spoken.Its direct effects, partly designed, partly undesigned, have affected our whole history to this day.It was his policy to disguise the fact of conquest, to cause all the spoils of conquest to be held, in outward form, according to the ancient law of England.The fiction became a fact, and the fact greatly helped in the process of fusion between Normans and English.The conquering race could not keep itself distinct from the conquered, and the form which the fusion took was for the conquerors to be lost in the greater mass of the conquered.William founded no new state, no new nation, no new constitution; he simply kept what he found, with such modifications as his position made needful.But without any formal change in the nature of English kingship, his position enabled him to clothe the crown with a practical power such as it had never held before, to make his rule, in short, a virtual despotism.These two facts determined the later course of English history, and they determined it to the lasting good of the English nation.The conservative instincts of William allowed our national life and our national institutions to live on unbroken through his conquest.But it was before all things the despotism of William, his despotism under legal forms, which preserved our national institutions to all time.As a less discerning conqueror might have swept our ancient laws and liberties away, so under a series of native kings those laws and liberties might have died out, as they died out in so many continental lands.But the despotism of the crown called forth the national spirit in a conscious and antagonistic shape; it called forth that spirit in men of both races alike, and made Normans and English one people.The old institutions lived on, to be clothed with a fresh life, to be modified as changed circumstances might make needful.The despotism of the Norman kings, the peculiar character of that despotism, enabled the great revolution of the thirteenth century to take the forms, which it took, at once conservative and progressive.So it was when, more than four centuries after William's day, England again saw a despotism carried on under the forms of law.Henry the Eighth reigned as William had reigned; he did not reign like his brother despots on the continent;the forms of law and ******* lived on.In the seventeenth century therefore, as in the thirteenth, the forms stood ready to be again clothed with a new life, to supply the means for another revolution, again at once conservative and progressive.It has been remarked a thousand times that, while other nations have been driven to destroy and to rebuild the political fabric, in England we have never had to destroy and to rebuild, but have found it enough to repair, to enlarge, and to improve.This characteristic of English history is mainly owing to the events of the eleventh century, and owing above all to the personal agency of William.As far as mortal man can guide the course of things when he is gone, the course of our national history since William's day has been the result of William's character and of William's acts.Well may we restore to him the surname that men gave him in his own day.He may worthily take his place as William the Great alongside of Alexander, Constantine, and Charles.They may have wrought in some sort a greater work, because they had a wider stage to work it on.But no man ever wrought a greater and more abiding work on the stage that fortune gave him than he "Qui dux Normannis, qui Caesar praefuit Anglis."Stranger and conqueror, his deeds won him a right to a place on the roll of English statesmen, and no man that came after him has won a right to a higher place.
End
