The House of Lords and that of the Commons divide the legislative power under the king,but the Romans had no such balance.The patricians and plebeians in Rome were perpetually at variance,and there was no intermediate power to reconcile them.The Roman senate,who were so unjustly,so criminally proud as not to suffer the plebeians to share with them in anything,could find no other artifice to keep the latter out of the administration than by employing them in foreign wars.They considered the plebeians as a wild beast,whom it behoved them to let loose upon their neighbours,for fear they should devour their masters.Thus the greatest defect in the Government of the Romans raised them to be conquerors.By being unhappy at home,they triumphed over and possessed themselves of the world,till at last their divisions sunk them to slavery.
The Government of England will never rise to so exalted a pitch of glory,nor will its end be so fatal.The English are not fired with the splendid folly of ****** conquests,but would only prevent their neighbours from conquering.They are not only jealous of their own liberty,but even of that of other nations.The English were exasperated against Louis XIV.for no other reason but because he was ambitious,and declared war against him merely out of levity,not from any interested motives.
The English have doubtless purchased their liberties at a very high price,and waded through seas of blood to drown the idol of arbitrary power.Other nations have been involved in as great calamities,and have shed as much blood;but then the blood they spilt in defence of their liberties only enslaved them the more.
That which rises to a revolution in England is no more than a sedition in other countries.A city in Spain,in Barbary,or in Turkey,takes up arms in defence of its privileges,when immediately it is stormed by mercenary troops,it is punished by executioners,and the rest of the nation kiss the chains they are loaded with.
The French are of opinion that the government of this island is more tempestuous than the sea which surrounds it,which indeed is true;but then it is never so but when the king raises the storm--when he attempts to seize the ship of which he is only the chief pilot.The civil wars of France lasted longer,were more cruel,and productive of greater evils than those of England;but none of these civil wars had a wise and prudent liberty for their object.
In the detestable reigns of Charles IX.and Henry III.the whole affair was only whether the people should be slaves to the Guises.
With regard to the last war of Paris,it deserves only to be hooted at.Methinks I see a crowd of schoolboys rising up in arms against their master,and afterwards whipped for it.Cardinal de Retz,who was witty and brave (but to no purpose),rebellious without a cause,factious without design,and head of a defenceless party,caballed for caballing sake,and seemed to foment the civil war merely out of diversion.The Parliament did not know what he intended,nor what he did not intend.He levied troops by Act of Parliament,and the next moment cashiered them.He threatened,he begged pardon;he set a price upon Cardinal Mazarin's head,and afterwards congratulated him in a public manner.Our civil wars under Charles VI.were bloody and cruel,those of the League execrable,and that of the Frondeurs ridiculous.
That for which the French chiefly reproach the English nation is the murder of King Charles I.,whom his subjects treated exactly as he would have treated them had his reign been prosperous.After all,consider on one side Charles I.,defeated in a pitched battle,imprisoned,tried,sentenced to die in Westminster Hall,and then beheaded.And on the other,the Emperor Henry VII.,poisoned by his chaplain at his receiving the Sacrament;Henry III.stabbed by a monk;thirty assassinations projected against Henry IV.,several of them put in execution,and the last bereaving that great monarch of his life.Weigh,I say,all these wicked attempts,and then judge.
